Augmented Reality–Assisted PDEODE Instruction for Reducing Misconceptions in Momentum and Impulse
Abstract
Misconceptions remain a persistent challenge in physics learning, particularly in the topics of momentum and impulse, which may hinder students understanding of subsequent physics concepts and problem-solving abilities. This study investigates the effect of implementing Augmented RealityAssisted Instruction integrated with the PDEODE learning strategy on reducing students misconceptions regarding momentum and impulse. The research employed a mixed-method approach using an embedded mixed- method design to obtain both quantitative and qualitative insights. The instruments used included a Four-Tier Momentum and Impulse diagnostic test (FOTMI), Augmented Realitybased student worksheets, and observation sheets for monitoring the implementation of learning activities. The participants consisted of 30 eleventh-grade students (7 male and 23 female) from a public senior high school in Central Java. The effectiveness of the AR- assisted PDEODE strategy was analyzed using Cohens d effect size, while the learning implementation was evaluated in percentage form to determine its feasibility and consistency. The findings indicate a reduction in students misconceptions from 37.7% in the pretest to 33.5% in the posttest, reflecting a decrease of 4.2%. Furthermore, the analysis of conceptual change revealed that 32% of students experienced Accepted Change (AC), 44% showed No Change (NC), and 25% demonstrated Unacceptable Change (UC). These results suggest that the integration of Augmented Reality with the PDEODE strategy has the potential to support conceptual understanding, although further refinement is needed to optimize learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Astuti, I. A. D., Wibawa, B., & Siregar, E. (2024). The influence of AR-based learning media in physics learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-301-6_75
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book237357
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of physics education research. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). VR and AR in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Vidak, A., et al. (2023). AR in physics education: Opportunities and challenges. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.18392
Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., & Samsudin, A. (2017). The effectiveness of visualization-based learning in reducing misconceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012110. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012110
Copyright (c) 2026 Novia Wulandari, Eleonora Agustine, Arafat Febriandirza, Esa Prakasa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







